| Author |
Message |
Help_me_BOB Senior Member


Joined: 23 Oct 2007
  Posts: 59

|
Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 7:49 am Post subject: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Hi guys,
Can somebody please help me by sending some information about the differences, licensing policies and the prices of BODI and INFA.
though I have gone thru the previous threads, I could not get anything from it.
Please help me guys.
thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antremons Principal Member


Joined: 21 Mar 2006
    Posts: 255

|
Posted: Fri May 09, 2008 2:28 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Hmm, frankly speaking it's very hard to compare those two, regarding the price I think that your best bet is to give a call to your INFA and BO reseller, to my understanding DI will be little bit cheaper than Informatica/DataStage, but actually that depends what kind of license you're looking for - 2CPU's, 4 CPU's, besides there are premium/professional versions available (correct me if I'm wrong),and there are different pricelists available for EMEA/USA and so on.
Cheers _________________ Data Warehousing, BO 6.1- XI 3.2/Crystal/EPM, DI 11.5 - DataServices 3.2, Data Federator XI 3.1, Polestar, BEX to WebI\Crystal migration. And little bit of SAP BPC, Xcelsius, ABC (Activity Base costing), Open BI source solutions |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cppwiz Senior Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2007
  Posts: 77

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rayjanak Forum Member


Joined: 16 Jun 2008
  Posts: 8

|
Posted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 5:45 pm Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Hi
I was searching for a comparison between BO Data Integrator and Informatica and came across this article.
I read the link mentioned by cppwiz which gives a very high level comparison.
I was looking for the comparison at a lower grain like below:
Informatica Vs DI
================
Repository = Repository
Mapping = Job
Work Flow = Work Flow
? = Data Flow
Transformation = Transform
OR
What would the joiner transformation correspond to in DI?
OR
How an update stratergy transformation can be done using DI?
Thanks in advance |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wdaehn Forum Groupie


Joined: 17 Dec 2004
    
*6 Posts: 7606 Location: Germany

|
Posted: Wed Jun 18, 2008 1:50 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Informatica vs DI
Repository = Repository
Mapping = Dataflow (where rows get moved)
? = Job (something you start)
? = Work Flow (to chain tasks together)
Transformation = Transform
What would the joiner transformation correspond to in DI? -> A query transform
How an update stratergy transformation can be done using DI? -> a Map or Table Comparison Transform _________________ Werner Daehn
Product Manager Data Integrator
SAP Business Objects
PLEASE SUPPORT THIS: Run one ATL job and tell us the benchmark result. Details to be found here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stef Forum Member


Joined: 14 Jan 2004
      Posts: 4 Location: In front of my desk

|
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 4:52 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Does someone already experiment the migration from INFA to BODI ?
I would like to try to estimate migration efforts needed for such migration project.
Thanks for your help,
Stef |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vincent.mcburney Forum Member


Joined: 14 Apr 2007
   Posts: 23 Location: Australia

|
Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
In terms of licensing and pricing you really need to contact each vendor and get them to quote for your pricing. List prices don't mean much in enterprise software and you may get very deep discounting for DI if you have SAP software.
There are new price and licensing options from Informatica such as the data migration pricing (you only pay license fees for about a year), SaaS licensing (low monthly subscription for hosted data quality or data integration) or the standard CPU based licensing that most ETL vendors use.
So generally DI will have cheaper pricing than Informatica or DataStage but it depends on what pricing scenarios each vendor supports. There is always a chance that one of the three will offer very deep discounting to win a new account so in any evaluation any one of the three could end up being the cheapest. _________________ My recent blog posts:
And the Oracle Spoke: Oracle Warehouse Builder and Data Integrator Shall Become One
40 DataStage Learning, Tutorial and Certification Online Resources |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lampack93 Senior Member


Joined: 23 May 2008
  Posts: 99

|
Posted: Thu May 07, 2009 6:19 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
Hi
Informatica Vs DI
================
Repository = Repository
Mapping = Job
Work Flow = Work Flow
Session = Data Flow
Transformation = Transform
I think there are lot more similarities for INFA and BODI...
if you can specifically ask the questions we can able to tell you ..
Regards,
Lampack |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gssharma Principal Member


Joined: 30 Oct 2006
    Posts: 283 Location: San Fransico, CA

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wahey Forum Associate


Joined: 31 May 2007
   Posts: 914 Location: Leiden, The Flatlands

|
Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2009 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
| stef wrote: | Does someone already experiment the migration from INFA to BODI ?
I would like to try to estimate migration efforts needed for such migration project.
Thanks for your help,
Stef |
I think it would be safe to say that you would need just as much time as you originally did, since there's no migration path. You would need to rebuild everything from scratch. A complete divestment basically. _________________ A post a day keeps the doctor away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cppwiz Senior Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2007
  Posts: 77

|
Posted: Thu Jun 18, 2009 9:59 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
| gssharma_msc wrote: | | http://dwhnotes.blog.co.in/data-integrator/etl-tool-comparision/ |
That comparison is so old it's completely and totally useless. DataStage 5.1? When was that in use, 1999? The current release is 8.1 and the product has changed greatly since then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
gssharma Principal Member


Joined: 30 Oct 2006
    Posts: 283 Location: San Fransico, CA

|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:30 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
| cppwiz wrote: |
That comparison is so old it's completely and totally useless. DataStage 5.1? When was that in use, 1999? The current release is 8.1 and the product has changed greatly since then. |
| Quote: |
However, I googled and I have got one in which they compared older versions of Informatica & DataStage and I added DI stuff(older version), I attached the same herewith. |
Yes, I know that's why I already mentioned it in the notes. I think you overlooked it. _________________ - Sudheer Sharma
http://dwhnotes.com/
(A tiny technical reference - BODI, DB, DW) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cppwiz Senior Member


Joined: 13 Sep 2007
  Posts: 77

|
Posted: Fri Jun 19, 2009 5:08 pm Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
| gssharma_msc wrote: |
Yes, I know that's why I already mentioned it in the notes. I think you overlooked it. |
You made a blog post in 2009 which references data that is at least 10 years old. How is this even remotely relevant to the topic of this thread? What's next, a riveting comparison of Windows 3.1 to PC-DOS? Puh-lease, spare me the genius of your insight from Mumbai. |
This post has been reported for Other. The current status is Closed / Resolved. Moderator Marek Chladny closed this report Click for Details
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marek Chladny Forum Devotee


Joined: 27 Nov 2003
      Posts: 10270

|
Posted: Sat Jun 20, 2009 9:10 am Post subject: Re: COMPARISON BODI vs INFA |
|
|
| cppwiz wrote: | | You made a blog post in 2009 which references data that is at least 10 years old. How is this even remotely relevant to the topic of this thread? What's next, a riveting comparison of Windows 3.1 to PC-DOS? Puh-lease, spare me the genius of your insight from Mumbai. | Hi cppwiz,
Please let me remind you of of "Be Polite" guideline from our forum Rules and Guidelines:
http://www.forumtopics.com/busobj/faq.php?mode=rules#1
If you don't like the answer then let the poster know your opinion in more professional way.
Thank you for your understanding. _________________ BO: XI r2 | 6.x | 5.x
DB: Oracle 10g | 9i | 8i
HW: Win 2003 servers |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|